NoBo vs DeBo vs AsBo: who assesses what in rail certification
Who this is for: engineers, project managers and newcomers to European rail certification who keep tripping over three near-identical acronyms. NoBo, DeBo and AsBo sound alike and are often engaged on the same project, but they assess different things, under different legislation, and answer to different appointing authorities. Here is the clean version.
The three bodies at a glance
| Body | Full name | Assesses conformity against… | Legal framework | Output |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoBo | Notified Body | The TSIs (EU-level technical rules) | Interoperability Directive (EU) 2016/797 | EC certificate of verification |
| DeBo | Designated Body | National technical rules | Same directive, national-rules route | Certificate of verification vs national rules |
| AsBo | Assessment Body | The applicant's risk-management process for a significant change | CSM-RA, Regulation (EU) 402/2013 | Safety assessment report |
The one-line distinction to memorise: NoBo = European rules, DeBo = national rules, AsBo = the risk process itself. The first two check that a subsystem conforms to technical specifications; the third checks that you managed risk properly.
Notified Body (NoBo)
A Notified Body performs conformity assessment against the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs). The TSIs are the EU-wide technical rules that make the rail system interoperable across borders — for rolling stock, control-command and signalling, infrastructure, energy and so on.
A NoBo is notified to the European Commission by a Member State (and listed in the Commission's NANDO database), having been assessed as competent — typically accredited to the relevant conformity-assessment standards. On completion of its work, the NoBo issues an EC certificate of verification for the subsystem (or an EC certificate of conformity for an interoperability constituent), which feeds into the "EC" declaration of verification the applicant draws up.
Familiar names operating as NoBos across Europe include the certification arms of bodies such as TÜV SÜD, TÜV Rheinland, SGS, DEKRA, Ricardo Certification, Lloyd's Register and CERTIFER — but which body and which scope matters more than the brand, because notification is granted per subsystem and per assessment module.
Which subsystems and modules a NoBo covers
A NoBo's notification is scoped: a body notified for the rolling stock subsystem is not automatically notified for control-command and signalling. Within that scope, the NoBo applies conformity-assessment modules — the standard EU menu (module SB for type examination, SD/SF for production-phase verification, SH1 for a full quality-management-system route, and so on). The applicant chooses a permitted module combination; the NoBo executes the assessment and issues the certificate. For how the modules map to the EC verification route, see TSI LOC&PAS requirements.
Designated Body (DeBo)
A Designated Body does the same kind of work as a NoBo — verification of a subsystem — but against national technical rules rather than the TSIs. National rules are the legitimate national complement to the TSIs: they cover open points (where the TSI deliberately leaves a topic to Member States), specific cases, and areas not yet harmonised at EU level.
A DeBo is designated by the Member State (not notified to the Commission), and its remit is that state's notified national rules. The output is a certificate confirming the subsystem meets the applicable national requirements, which sits alongside the NoBo's EC certificate in the authorisation dossier.
When a DeBo is needed alongside a NoBo
You need both whenever the vehicle or subsystem is subject to national rules in addition to the TSIs — which, in practice, is most real projects. The TSIs rarely cover everything: open points and specific cases remain, and any network with legacy characteristics carries national rules for compatibility. So a typical authorisation runs two parallel assessment streams: the NoBo against the TSIs, the DeBo against each relevant Member State's national rules. Note that one accredited organisation is frequently designated for both roles (see the FAQ) — but the two hats, and the two certificates, remain distinct.
Assessment Body (AsBo / CSM)
An Assessment Body performs independent assessment of the applicant's risk management under the Common Safety Method for Risk Assessment (CSM-RA), Regulation (EU) 402/2013. This is a fundamentally different activity from conformity assessment.
When a proposer makes a significant change to the railway system — technical, operational or organisational — the CSM-RA requires them to run a structured risk-assessment process (hazard identification, risk evaluation against acceptance principles, and the definition and management of safety requirements). The AsBo independently assesses whether that process was applied correctly and completely, and issues a CSM safety assessment report. The AsBo must be independent of the design, risk assessment, manufacture, operation and maintenance of the system under assessment, and is typically accredited or recognised to ISO/IEC 17020.
How the AsBo's remit differs from conformity assessment
This is the distinction people most often get wrong:
- A NoBo/DeBo asks "does this subsystem conform to the rules?" — a technical, specification-driven check.
- An AsBo asks "did you assess and manage the risk of this change correctly?" — a process-driven check of your risk management.
An AsBo does not certify that a train is safe; it gives assurance that the risk-assessment process behind a change was sound. The two are complementary. Note also a related-but-separate role: the independent safety assessor (ISA) referred to in the CENELEC EN 5012x standards is a distinct concept from the CSM AsBo, though the same organisation may perform both — don't assume they are interchangeable on your project.
How the three fit together in a vehicle authorisation
Consider a new passenger vehicle to be authorised for a single Member State plus one neighbour:
- NoBo assesses the subsystems against the applicable TSIs (rolling stock, CCS, noise, PRM) and issues EC certificate(s) of verification.
- DeBo(s) assess the same vehicle against the notified national rules of each state of intended use, issuing national certificate(s).
- AsBo independently assesses the risk management for the change under the CSM-RA and issues the safety assessment report.
- The applicant compiles all of this into a single dossier and submits an application for a vehicle type authorisation / authorisation for placing on the market.
- Since the 4th Railway Package, the European Union Agency for Railways is the authorising entity for vehicles used in more than one Member State (via its One-Stop Shop), while a National Safety Authority may authorise vehicles for a single state. The authorising entity relies on the NoBo, DeBo and AsBo outputs — it does not redo their work.
For the end-to-end process, see TSI LOC&PAS requirements on what the rolling-stock TSI actually requires of that dossier.
Frequently asked questions
Can one organisation be both NoBo and DeBo?
Who appoints each body?
Is an AsBo always required?
How does the Agency (ERA) fit in?
Sources
- Interoperability Directive (EU) 2016/797 — EUR-Lex
- CSM-RA — Regulation (EU) 402/2013, summary (SaRS)
- ERA — Recommendation for Use: Working method of the Assessment Body
- ERA — Explanatory note on the CSM Assessment Body
- NoBo / DeBo / AsBo services — CERTIFER
- Railway Assessment Body (AsBo) — TÜV SÜD
- SGS — 4th Railway Package under NoBo accreditation scope
ERA Standards is an independent product and is not affiliated with the European Union Agency for Railways. This guide is general information, not certification advice.